I think the best novelists are perhaps necessarily not the smartest ones. It's the ones who find pleasure in representing what's a challenge to make beautiful. I don't believe Tolstoy was a genius, as in all-around smart guy. I feel he recognized he had a genius FOR a certain kind of expression and this helped him tackle some of the preoccupations (with theories of history etc) that he was less genius at. Novelists for example like Iris Murdoch, William T. Vollman, maybe Richard Powers, strike me as so innately and broadly intelligent that their work is arid in some basic way: it wants to be a philosophical treatise, an encyclopedic history etc, instead of a story told with some representational acumen as a way for the author to see and make communion with an imagined readership, which is what those with this limited gift accomplish, writing books that live.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
"A man's intelligence is his soil." - WS "A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent" - WB "Truth can never be told so as to be understood, and not be believ'd" -WB "The Sun must bear no name, gold flourisher, but be in the difficulty that it is to be." - WS
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
test 2023
test now
-
if I'm only motivated to act by adrenaline, by the sense of a deadline, or perhaps the ultimate deadline, which is death, and that simpl...
-
Don't a be a hyena. A snickering wound licking scampering opinionator.
-
<fontfamily><param>Skia</param> </fontfamily>
No comments:
Post a Comment